Book traversal links for Statements of evidence
Tumours of low malignant potential
STATEMENTS | LEVEL OF EVIDENCE11 | REFERENCE |
---|---|---|
Patients with tumours of low malignant potential (borderline or proliferating), even with documented metastases, have an excellent prognosis. In the absence of documented invasive peritoneal implants, adjuvant chemotherapy is not indicated. |
II |
Siedman and Kurman 200012
|
Women with early stage ovarian cancer, Stage I-IIA
STATEMENTS | LEVEL OF EVIDENCE11 | REFERENCE |
---|---|---|
There is evidence from a meta-analysis that indicates that some women with early stage (I-IIA) epithelial ovarian cancer who received adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy had better 5-year overall survival (HR 0.71; p=0.01) and 5-year progression-free survival (HR 0.67, P=0.0005) than women who did not. Improved overall and progression-free survival for women who received adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy was maintained at 10 years. OS: HR 0.74, p=0.02. PFS: HR 0.67, p=0.0005 |
I |
Winter-Roach 201213 |
Sub-group analysis: For women with early stage epithelial ovarian cancer who had comprehensive surgical staging, there was no significant difference in overall survival (two trials) or in progression-free survival (two trials) between those who did and did not receive adjuvant chemotherapy. OS: HR 1.22 (95% CI 0.63 to 2.37), p=0.56. PFS: HR 0.67 (95% CI 0.36 to 1.22), p=0.19. In women who had sub-optimal staging, those who received adjuvant chemotherapy had statistically significantly better overall survival (two trials) and progression-free survival (three trials). OS: HR 0.63 (95% CI 0.46 to 0.85), p= 0.003. PFS: HR 0.64 (95% CI 0.50 to 0.82), p=0.0004 In one trial that reported survival grouped by level of risk, adjuvant chemotherapy improved 10-year overall and progression-free survival in high risk women, but not in those at low/medium risk. OS: HR 0.48 (95% CI 0.32 to 0.72), p=0.00039. PFS: HR 0.52 (95% CI 0.33 to 0.82) p=0.0049 |
I |
Winter-Roach 201213 |
Advanced ovarian cancer (IIB-IV)- Chemotherapy
STATEMENTS | LEVEL OF EVIDENCE11 | REFERENCE |
---|---|---|
Almost all regimens which investigated the addition or substitution of a range of agents to the standard regimen of combination carboplatin and paclitaxel, in populations with a majority of advanced stage ovarian cancer patients, failed to demonstrate an overall or progression-free survival advantage.
|
II |
OVAR 11/ ICON714 GOG 21815 OVAR 516 OVAR 917 GOG 182/ ICON518 Bolis 201019 OVAR 720 OV 1621 HeCOG22 Lhomme 200823 GOCCNE24 SGCTG25 MITO 226 SCOTROC27 GOG 15828 OVAR 329, 30 HeCOG31 Mouratidou32 OV 1033-35 AOCSG36 Muthuramalingam37 SCOTROC2A38 SCOTROC2B39 Minagawa 200640 Mori 200741 JGOG301442 Fruscio 200843 |
Advanced ovarian cancer (IIB-IV) – Biological therapies
STATEMENTS | LEVEL OF EVIDENCE11 | REFERENCE |
---|---|---|
In ICON7, improved progression-free survival was reported in the group receiving bevacizumab compared with standard therapy; HR=0.81 p=0.04. The maximum improvement was at 12 months, co-inciding with the end of planned bevacizumab treatment, and diminished by 24 months. |
II |
Perren 201114 |
In ICON7, improved overall survival was reported in a sub-group of patients at high risk of progression when bevacizumab was used in addition to carboplatin and paclitaxel; HR=0.64, p=0.002. |
II |
Perren 201114 |
In ICON7, bevacizumab treatment was associated with a small but clinically significant decrease in quality of life compared to standard chemotherapy. |
II |
Stark 201354 |
In the GOG 218 trial, progression-free survival was improved in the bevacizumab throughout arm (chemotherapy plus bevacizumab cycles 2 to 22) (p= <0.001), but not in the bevacizumab initiation arm (chemotherapy plus bevacizumab cycles 2 to 6), compared to the chemotherapy control group. |
II |
Burger 201115 |
In GOG 218, in both arms concurrent bevacizumab compared to control without bevacizumab, doubled the odds of a gastrointestinal adverse event (odds ratio 2.15, 95% CI 1.05-4.40, p=0.032), after controlling for history of treatment for irritable bowel disease, small bowel resection at primary surgery and bowel resection at primary surgery, however was not appreciably increased by continuation of bevacizumab beyond chemotherapy. |
II |
Burger 201455 |
Scheduling – Dose-dense chemotherapy
STATEMENTS | LEVEL OF EVIDENCE11 | REFERENCE |
---|---|---|
In one trial (JGOG 3016), dose-dense paclitaxel improved overall survival at 5 years (58.6% vs. 51.0%, HR 0.79, p=0.0448) and median progression-free survival at median 6.4 years follow-up (28.1 vs. 17.5 months, HR 0.75, p=0.0037) in women with advanced ovarian cancer compared with standard treatment. Anaemia was worse in the dose-dense arm but no significant differences were reported for other toxicities. |
II |
Katsumata 200947 Katsumata 201248
|
In two trials that investigated complex, high-dose chemotherapy regimens including peripheral blood stem cell support, no overall or progression-free survival differences were reported between intervention and standard treatment arms. |
II |
Grenman 200656 Mobus 200757 |
Scheduling – Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy
STATEMENTS | LEVEL OF EVIDENCE11 | REFERENCE |
---|---|---|
A meta-analysis has indicated that women with epithelial ovarian cancer who received an intraperitoneal component of chemotherapy had significantly better overall survival HR 0.81, p=0.0002 and progression-free survival HR 0.78, p<0.00001, than women who did not. |
I |
Jaaback 201145
|
Women receiving intraperitoneal chemotherapy were significantly more likely to experience a range of adverse events, including gastrointestinal effects, pain, fever and infection. |
I |
Jaaback 201145 |
Scheduling – Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy
STATEMENTS | LEVEL OF EVIDENCE11 | REFERENCE |
---|---|---|
One randomised trial has indicated no differences in median overall survival between treatment arms for women receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared with primary surgery. |
II |
Vergote 201044 |
Subgroup analyses by age, FIGO stage, WHO performance status, histologic type and presence or absence of pleural fluid demonstrated no survival differences between neoadjuvant chemotherapy and primary surgery arms. |
II |
Vergote 201044 |
More adverse events were observed in the primary surgery arm compared with women receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. |
II |
Vergote 201044 |
BRCA mutations
STATEMENTS | LEVEL OF EVIDENCE11 | REFERENCE |
---|---|---|
BRCA mutation carriers were more likely to have a complete or partial response to platinum-based chemotherapy than non-carriers or sporadic cases. |
III-2 |
Yang 201158 Vencken 201159 Tan 200960 |
Women with a BRCA1/2 mutation receiving a platinum-based regimen were less likely to have disease progression within 6 months of the end of primary treatment compared with those who did not carry a BRCA1/2 mutation; 14.9% vs. 31.7%, p<0.001. |
III-2 |
Alsop 201261 |
Older women
STATEMENTS | LEVEL OF EVIDENCE11 | REFERENCE |
---|---|---|
Improved survival was reported in women aged 65 years and older who received chemotherapy compared with those who had no chemotherapy (RR 0.59). |
III-2 |
Hershman 200462 |
In a study of women with median age 73 years, overall survival and progression-free survival were improved in women receiving carboplatin or a combination of platinum and paclitaxel compared with those receiving a non-platinum regimen. |
II |
Reed 200625
|
Women aged 70 years and over discontinued their treatment earlier than those aged under 70 years (p=0.001). |
III-3
|
Hilpert 200763 |
In the OVAR trial, most haematological toxicity did not differ between age groups; however, febrile neutropenia was more frequent in older patients than in younger patients (p <0.001). There were no significant differences in non-haematological toxicity between age groups, except that older patients were more likely to get grade 3/4 infections. |
III-3
|
Hilpert 200763 |
Obese patients
STATEMENTS | LEVEL OF EVIDENCE11 | REFERENCE |
---|---|---|
While the evidence indicates that obese women are under dosed and have inferior survival, the available evidence is limited. No studies were identified which specifically compared different doses of chemotherapy among obese patients for survival outcomes.
|
III-3
|
Wright 200864 Barrett 200865 Matthews 200966 Suh 201267 |
|
III-3
|
Barrett 200865 |
|
III-3
|
Matthews 200966 |
|
III-3
|
Hanna 201368 |
|
III-3
|
Pavelka 200669 |
|
III-3
|
Au-Yeung 201470 |
In one retrospective analysis, where the average dose of carboplatin received did not differ across the BMI strata, obese women were less likely to experience treatment-related toxicity. |
III-3 |
Wright 200864
|
A retrospective study of adverse events reported that a BMI<30 and BSA <2.0m2 were univariate predictors of severe neutropenia in women with stage III and IV undergoing a multi-agent intravenous chemotherapy (p=<0.01 and p=0.03). |
III-3 |
Laskey 201271
|
One study reported similar rates of neutropenia for obese and non-obese patients. |
III-3 |
Matthews 200966 |