Appendix 3: Recommendation Grading Forms

Recommendation 1 - CBT for vasomotor symptoms

Evidence summaries

Study characteristics

Study name Population Intervention Level of study Risk of Bias Country

Duijts 2012

Breast cancer

CBT

II

moderate

the Netherlands

Mann 2012

Breast cancer

CBT

II

moderate

UK

Velez Toral 2014

Menopause

CBT

I

moderate

UK

Recommendation matrix

Component Rating Description

1. Evidence base

B

one level I study with a moderate risk of bias, two level II studies with a moderate risk of bias

2. Consistency

C

some inconsistency reflecting genuine uncertainty around clinical question

3. Clinical impact

D

slight or restricted

4. Generalisability

B

population/s studied in the body of evidence are similar to the target population for the guideline: some studies were in women treated for breast cancer and some studies were in a general menopausal population

5. Applicability

A

directly applicable to Australian healthcare context: all studies were conducted in Australia or developed countries with similar levels of health service delivery

Recommendation

Purpose-designed cognitive behavioural therapy can be considered for the management of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms in women with a history of breast cancer.

GRADE OF RECOMMENDATION

C

 

Recommendation 2 and Practice Point A - Physical activity for vasomotor symptoms and sleep disturbance

Evidence summaries - Yoga

Study characteristics

Study name Population Intervention Level of study Risk of Bias Country

Carson 2009

Breast cancer

Yoga

II

moderate

USA

Cramer 2015

Breast cancer

Yoga

II

moderate

Germany

Daley 2014

Menopause

Yoga

I

low

USA

Woods 2014

Menopause

Yoga

I

moderate

India

Newton 2014

Menopause

Yoga

II

low

USA

Recommendation matrix

Component Rating Description

1. Evidence base

A

one level I study and one level II study with a low risk of bias, one level I and two level II studies with a moderate risk of bias

2. Consistency

D

evidence is inconsistent

3. Clinical impact

D

slight or restricted

4. Generalisability

B

population/s studied in the body of evidence are similar to the target population for the guideline

5. Applicability

B

applicable to Australian healthcare context with few caveats

Recommendation

Yoga can be considered for the management of vasomotor symptoms and sleep disturbance in women with a history of breast cancer noting there is inconsistent evidence regarding its effectiveness.

Practice Point A:

There is evidence that exercise has no effect on vasomotor symptoms in a general population, although there are other benefits of physical activity for women with a history of breast cancer.

GRADE OF RECOMMENDATION

D

 

Recommendation 2 : Acupuncture and electro-acupuncture for vasomotor symptoms

Evidence summaries: acupuncture

Study characteristics: acupuncture

Study name Population Intervention Level of study Risk of Bias Country

Bokmand 2013

Breast cancer

acupuncture

II

low

Denmark

Deng 2007

Breast cancer

acupuncture

II

moderate

USA

Hervik 2009

Breast cancer

acupuncture

II

low

Norway

Liljegren 2012

Breast cancer

acupuncture

II

moderate

Sweden

Walker 2010

Breast cancer

acupuncture

II

high

USA

Dodin 2013

Menopause

acupuncture

I

low

Denmark, Korea, Norway, Sweden, USA

Ee 2016

Menopause

acupuncture

II

low

Australia

Evidence summaries - electro-acupuncture

Study characteristics - electro-acupuncture

Study name Population Intervention Level of study Risk of Bias Country

Frisk 2008/Frisk 2012

Breast cancer

electro-acupuncture

II

high

Sweden

Mao 2015

Breast cancer

electro-acupuncture

II

moderate

USA

Nedstrand 2005/Nedstrand 2006

Breast cancer

electro-acupuncture

II

high

Sweden

Recommendation matrix

Component Rating Description

1. Evidence base

A

one level I study with a low risk of bias, two level II studies with a low risk of bias, three level II studies with a moderate risk of bias, three level II studies with a high risk of bias

2. Consistency

D

evidence is inconsistent

3. Clinical impact

C

moderate

4. Generalisability

B

population/s studied in the body of evidence are similar to the target population for the guideline: some studies were in women treated for breast cancer and some studies were in a general menopausal population

5. Applicability

A

directly applicable to Australian healthcare context: all studies were conducted in Australia or developed countries with similar levels of health service delivery

Recommendation

Acupuncture and electro-acupuncture can be considered for the management of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms in women with a history of breast cancer noting there is inconsistent evidence regarding their effectiveness.

GRADE OF RECOMMENDATION

D

 

Recommendation 4: Hypnotherapy for vasomotor symptoms

Evidence summaries

Study characteristics

Study name Population Intervention Level of study Risk of Bias Country

Elkins 2008

Breast cancer

hypnotherapy

II

moderate

USA

Recommendation matrix

Component Rating Description

1. Evidence base

C

one level II study with a moderate risk of bias

2. Consistency

N/A

one study only

3. Clinical impact

D

slight or restricted

4. Generalisability

A

population/s studied in body of evidence are the same as the target population for the guideline: all studies were in women treated for breast cancer

5. Applicability

A

directly applicable to Australian healthcare context: all studies were conducted in Australia or developed countries with similar levels of health service delivery

Recommendation

Purpose-designed hypnotherapy can be considered for the management of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms in women with a history of breast cancer.

GRADE OF RECOMMENDATION

D

 

Recommendation 5: Black cohosh for vasomotor symptoms

Evidence summaries

Study characteristics

Study name Population Intervention Level of study Risk of Bias Country

Hernandez Munoz 2003

Breast cancer

black cohosh

II

high

Venezuela

Jacobson 2001

Breast cancer

black cohosh

II

low

USA

Pockaj 2006

Breast cancer

black cohosh

II

moderate

USA

Leach and Moore 2012

Menopause

black cohosh

I

low

Switzerland, USA

Recommendation matrix

Component Rating Description

1. Evidence base

A

one level I study with a low risk of bias, one level II study with a low risk of bias, one level II study with a moderate risk of bias, one level II study with a high risk of bias

2. Consistency

A

all studies consistent

3. Clinical impact

N/A

none

4. Generalisability

B

population/s studied in the body of evidence are similar to the target population for the guideline: some studies were in women treated for breast cancer and some studies were in a general menopausal population

5. Applicability

B

applicable to Australian healthcare context with few caveats: most studies were conducted in Australia or developed countries with similar levels of health service delivery

Recommendation

Black cohosh is not recommended for the management of vasomotor symptoms in women with a history of breast cancer due to evidence that it is not effective.

GRADE OF RECOMMENDATION

B

 

Recommendation 6: Homeopathy for vasomotor symptoms

Evidence summaries

Study characteristics

Study name Population Intervention Level of study Risk of Bias Country

Jacobs 2005

Breast cancer

homeopathy

II

high

USA

Thompson 2005

Breast cancer

homeopathy

II

low

UK

Recommendation matrix

Component Rating Description

1. Evidence base

B

one level II study with a low risk of bias, one level II study with a high risk of bias

2. Consistency

A

all studies consistent

3. Clinical impact

N/A

none

4. Generalisability

A

population/s studied in body of evidence are the same as the target population for the guideline: all studies were in women treated for breast cancer

5. Applicability

A

directly applicable to Australian healthcare context: all studies were conducted in Australia or developed countries with similar levels of health service delivery

Recommendation

Homeopathy is not recommended for the management of vasomotor symptoms in women with a history of breast cancer due to evidence that it is not effective.

GRADE OF RECOMMENDATION

B

 

Recommendation 7: Magnetic therapy for vasomotor symptoms

Evidence summaries

Study characteristics

Study name Population Intervention Level of study Risk of Bias Country

Carpenter 2002

Breast cancer

magnetic therapy

II

moderate

USA

Recommendation matrix

Component Rating Description

1. Evidence base

C

one level II study with a moderate risk of bias

2. Consistency

N/A

One study only

3. Clinical impact

N/A

none

4. Generalisability

A

population/s studied in body of evidence are the same as the target population for the guideline: all studies were in women treated for breast cancer

5. Applicability

A

directly applicable to Australian healthcare context: all studies were conducted in Australia or developed countries with similar levels of health service delivery

Recommendation

Magnetic therapy is not recommended for the management of vasomotor symptoms in women with a history of breast cancer due to evidence that it is not effective.

GRADE OF RECOMMENDATION

C

 

Recommendation 8: Omega-3 supplementation for vasomotor symptoms

Evidence summaries

Study characteristics

Study name Population Intervention Level of study Risk of Bias Country

Cohen 2014

Menopause

omega-3 supplementation

II

low

USA

Recommendation matrix

Component Rating Description

1. Evidence base

B

one level II study with a low risk of bias

2. Consistency

N/A

One study only

3. Clinical impact

N/A

none

4. Generalisability

C

population/s studied in body of evidence differ to target population for guideline but it is clinically sensible to apply this evidence to target population: all studies were in a general menopausal population

5. Applicability

A

directly applicable to Australian healthcare context: all studies were conducted in Australia or developed countries with similar levels of health service delivery

Recommendation

Omega-3 supplementation is not recommended for the management of vasomotor symptoms in women with a history of breast cancer due to evidence that it is not effective.

GRADE OF RECOMMENDATION

C

 

Recommendation 9: Phytoestrogens for vasomotor symptoms

Evidence summaries

Study characteristics

Study name Population Intervention Level of study Risk of Bias Country

MacGregor 2005

Breast cancer

isoflavones

II

low

UK

Nikander 2003

Breast cancer

isoflavones

II

moderate

Finland

Van Patten 2002

Breast cancer

soy isoflavones

II

high

Canada

Thomas 2014

Menopause

soy and other isoflavones

I

moderate

Brazil, Canada, Ecuador, Iran, Italy, Japan, Korea, Taiwan, UK, USA

Recommendation matrix

Component Rating Description

1. Evidence base

B

one level I study with a moderate risk of bias, one level II study with a low risk of bias, one level II study with a moderate risk of bias and one level II study with a high risk of bias

2. Consistency

C

some inconsistency reflecting genuine uncertainty around clinical question

3. Clinical impact

D

slight or restricted

4. Generalisability

B

 Population/s studied in body of evidence differ to target population and hard to judge whether it is sensible to generalise to target population

5. Applicability

B

applicable to Australian healthcare context with few caveats: most studies were conducted in Australia or developed countries with similar levels of health service delivery

Recommendation

Phytoestrogens are not recommended for the management of vasomotor symptoms as the efficacy and long-term safety in women with a history of breast cancer has not been established.

GRADE OF RECOMMENDATION

d

 

Recommendation 10: CBT for sleep disturbance

Evidence summaries

Study characteristics

Study name Population Intervention Level of study Risk of Bias Country

Mann 2012

Breast cancer

CBT

II

moderate

UK

Matthews 2014

Breast cancer

CBT

II

low

USA

Recommendation matrix

Component Rating Description

1. Evidence base

B

one II study with a low risk of bias, one level II study with a moderate risk of bias

2. Consistency

C

some inconsistency reflecting genuine uncertainty around clinical question

3. Clinical impact

C

moderate

4. Generalisability

A

population/s studied in body of evidence are the same as the target population for the guideline: all studies were in women treated for breast cancer

5. Applicability

A

directly applicable to Australian healthcare context: all studies were conducted in Australia or developed countries with similar levels of health service delivery

Recommendation

Purpose-designed cognitive behavioural therapy can be considered for the management of sleep disturbance in women with a history of breast cancer.

GRADE OF RECOMMENDATION

C

 

Recommendation 11: Relaxation therapy for sleep disturbance

Evidence summaries

Study characteristics

Study name Population Intervention Level of study Risk of Bias Country

Woods 2014

Menopause

relaxation therapy

I

moderate

USA

Recommendation matrix

Component Rating Description

1. Evidence base

B

One level I study with a moderate risk of bias

2. Consistency

N/A

one study only

3. Clinical impact

C

moderate

4. Generalisability

C

population/s studied in body of evidence differ to target population for guideline but it is clinically sensible to apply this evidence to target population: all studies were in a general menopausal population

5. Applicability

A

directly applicable to Australian healthcare context: all studies were conducted in Australia or developed countries with similar levels of health service delivery

Recommendation

Relaxation therapy can be considered for the management of sleep disturbance in women with a history of breast cancer.

GRADE OF RECOMMENDATION

C

 

Recommendation 12: Hypnotherapy for sleep disturbance

Evidence summaries

Study characteristics

Study name Population Intervention Level of study Risk of Bias Country

Elkins 2008

Breast cancer

hypnotherapy

II

moderate

USA

Recommendation matrix

Component Rating Description

1. Evidence base

C

one level II study with a moderate risk of bias

2. Consistency

N/A

one study only

3. Clinical impact

C

moderate

4. Generalisability

A

population/s studied in body of evidence are the same as the target population for the guideline: all studies were in women treated for breast cancer

5. Applicability

A

directly applicable to Australian healthcare context: all studies were conducted in Australia or developed countries with similar levels of health service delivery

Recommendation

Purpose-designed hypnotherapy can be considered for the management of sleep disturbance in women with a history of breast cancer.

GRADE OF RECOMMENDATION

C

 

Recommendation 13: Acupuncture for sleep disturbance

Evidence summaries

Study characteristics

Study name Population Intervention Level of study Risk of Bias Country

Bokmand 2013

Breast cancer

acupuncture

II

low

Denmark

Recommendation matrix

Component Rating Description

1. Evidence base

B

one level II study with a low risk of bias

2. Consistency

N/A

one study only

3. Clinical impact

C

moderate

4. Generalisability

A

population/s studied in body of evidence are the same as the target population for the guideline: all studies were in women treated for breast cancer

5. Applicability

A

directly applicable to Australian healthcare context: all studies were conducted in Australia or developed countries with similar levels of health service delivery

Recommendation

Acupuncture can be considered for the management of sleep disturbance in women with a history of breast cancer.

GRADE OF RECOMMENDATION

C

 

Recommendation 14: Vitamin E for sleep disturbance

Evidence summaries

Study characteristics

Study name Population Intervention Level of study Risk of Bias Country

Biglia 2009

Breast cancer

Vitamin E

800 IU/d

II

moderate

Italy

Recommendation matrix

Component Rating Description

1. Evidence base

C

one level II study with a moderate risk of bias

2. Consistency

N/A

one study only

3. Clinical impact

N/A

none

4. Generalisability

A

population/s studied in body of evidence are the same as the target population for the guideline: all studies were in women treated for breast cancer

5. Applicability

A

directly applicable to Australian healthcare context: all studies were conducted in Australia or developed countries with similar levels of health service delivery

Recommendation

Vitamin E is not recommended for the management of sleep disturbance in women with a history of breast cancer due to evidence that it is not effective.

GRADE OF RECOMMENDATION

C

 

Recommendation 15: Isoflavones for sleep disturbance

Evidence summaries

Study characteristics

Study name Population Intervention Level of study Risk of Bias Country

Thomas 2014

Menopause

soy and other isoflavones

I

moderate

Italy

Recommendation matrix

Component Rating Description

1. Evidence base

B

One level I study with a moderate risk of bias

2. Consistency

N/A

one study only

3. Clinical impact

N/A

none

4. Generalisability

C

population/s studied in body of evidence differ to target population for guideline but it is clinically sensible to apply this evidence to target population: all studies were in a general menopausal population

5. Applicability

A

directly applicable to Australian healthcare context: all studies were conducted in Australia or developed countries with similar levels of health service delivery

Recommendation

Isoflavones are not recommended for the management of sleep disturbance in women with a history of breast cancer due to evidence that they are not effective.

GRADE OF RECOMMENDATION

C

 

Recommendation 16: Non-hormonal vaginal gels for vulvovaginal symptoms

Evidence summaries

Study characteristics

Study name Population Intervention Level of study Risk of Bias Country

Lee 2011

Breast cancer

non-hormonal vaginal gel

II

low

South Korea

Recommendation matrix

Component Rating Description

1. Evidence base

B

one level II study with a low risk of bias

2. Consistency

N/A

one study only

3. Clinical impact

C

moderate

4. Generalisability

A

population/s studied in body of evidence are the same as the target population for the guideline: all studies were in women treated for breast cancer

5. Applicability

A

directly applicable to Australian healthcare context: all studies were conducted in Australia or developed countries with similar levels of health service delivery

Recommendation

Non-hormonal vaginal gels can be considered for the treatment of vulvovaginal symptoms in women with a history of breast cancer.

Practice Point B:

Non-hormonal vaginal moisturisers can be considered for the treatment of vulvovaginal symptoms in women with a history of breast cancer.

Practice point C:

Water-based or silicone-based vaginal lubricants can be used to enhance the comfort and ease of sexual intercourse.

GRADE OF RECOMMENDATION

C

 

Recommendation 17: CBT for sexual function

Evidence summaries

Study characteristics

Study name Population Intervention Level of study Risk of Bias Country

Duijts 2012

Breast cancer

CBT

II

moderate

The Netherlands

Recommendation matrix

Component Rating Description

1. Evidence base

C

one level II study with a moderate risk of bias

2. Consistency

N/A

one study only

3. Clinical impact

C

moderate

4. Generalisability

A

population/s studied in body of evidence are the same as the target population for the guideline: all studies were in women treated for breast cancer

5. Applicability

A

directly applicable to Australian healthcare context: all studies were conducted in Australia or developed countries with similar levels of health service delivery

Recommendation

Purpose-designed cognitive behavioural therapy can be considered for improving sexual function in women with a history of breast cancer.

GRADE OF RECOMMENDATION

C

 

Recommendation 18: Venlafaxine for vasomotor symptoms

Evidence summaries

Study characteristics

Study name Population Intervention Level of study Risk of Bias Country

Boekhout 2011

Breast cancer

venlafaxine

75mg/d (slow release)

II

low

the Netherlands

Bordeleau 2010

Breast cancer

venlafaxine

37.5-75mg/d

II

moderate

Canada

Buijs 2009

Breast cancer

venlafaxine

75mg/d

II

moderate

the Netherlands

Carpenter 2007

Breast cancer

venlafaxine

37.5mg/d

II

moderate

USA

Loibl 2007

Breast cancer

venlafaxine

75mg/d

II

moderate

Germany

Walker 2010

Breast cancer

venlafaxine

37.5-75mg/d

II

moderate

USA

Joffe 2014

Menopause

venlafaxine

37.5-75mg/d

II

low

USA

Recommendation matrix

Component Rating Description
  1. Evidence base

B

two level II studies with a low risk of bias, five level II studies with a moderate risk of bias

  1. Consistency

A

all studies consistent

  1. Clinical impact

B

substantial

  1. Generalisability

A

evidence directly generalisable to target population

  1. Applicability

A

directly applicable to Australian healthcare context

Recommendation

Venlafaxine (37.5 - 75 mg/day) can be considered for the management of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms in women with a history of breast cancer.

GRADE OF RECOMMENDATION

A

Recommendation 19: Paroxetine for vasomotor symptoms

Evidence summaries: paroxetine

Study characteristics: paroxetine

Study name Population Intervention Level of study Risk of Bias Country

Stearns 2005

Breast cancer

paroxetine

10-20 mg/d

II

low

USA

Recommendation matrix

Component Rating Description

1. Evidence base

B

one level II study with a low risk of bias

2. Consistency

N/A

one study only

3. Clinical impact

B

substantial

4. Generalisability

A

population/s studied in body of evidence are the same as the target population for the guideline: all studies were in women treated for breast cancer

5. Applicability

B

evidence applicable to Australian healthcare context with few caveats

Other factors(Indicate here any other factors that you took into account when assessing the evidence base (for example,  issues that might cause the group to downgrade or upgrade  the recommendation)

Recommendation

Paroxetine (10 - 20 mg/day) can be considered for the management of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms in women with a history of breast cancer who are not receiving tamoxifen.

This recommendation is not generalisable to other SSRIs as there is insufficient evidence in women with a history of breast cancer that they have comparable effects on vasomotor symptoms.

Note: Paroxetine interacts with tamoxifen and reduces the serum concentration of tamoxifen and metabolites.

GRADE OF RECOMMENDATION

B

 

Recommendation 20: Escitalopram for vasomotor symptoms

Evidence summaries

Study characteristics

Study name Population Intervention Level of study Risk of Bias Country

Shams 2014

Menopause

escitalopram

10-20 mg/d

I

low

USA

Recommendation matrix

Component Rating Description

1. Evidence base

A

one level I study with a low risk of bias

2. Consistency

A

all studies consistent

3. Clinical impact

B

substantial

4. Generalisability

C

population/s studied in body of evidence differ to target population for guideline but it is clinically sensible to apply this evidence to target population: all studies were in a general menopausal population

5. Applicability

A

directly applicable to Australian healthcare context: all studies were conducted in Australia or developed countries with similar levels of health service delivery

Recommendation

Escitalopram (10–20 mg/d) can be considered for the management of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms in women with a history of breast cancer, based on evidence from a general population of menopausal women.

Note: Escitalopram may reduce the efficacy of tamoxifen by slowing metabolism to the active form. There is little evidence for clinical concern resulting from their concomitant use.

GRADE OF RECOMMENDATION

B

 

Recommendation 21: Desvenlafaxine for vasomotor symptoms

Evidence summaries

Study characteristics

Study name Population Intervention Level of study Risk of Bias Country

Sun 2013

Menopause

desvenlafaxine

100-150 mg/day

I

low

not reported

Berhan 2014

Menopause

desvenlafaxine

≥100 mg/d

I

moderate

Europe, North America, South Africa

Recommendation matrix

Component Rating Description

1. Evidence base

A

one level I study with a low risk of bias, one level I study with a moderate risk of bias

2. Consistency

B

most studies consistent and inconsistency may be explained

3. Clinical impact

B

substantial

4. Generalisability

C

population/s studied in body of evidence differ to target population for guideline but it is clinically sensible to apply this evidence to target population: all studies were in a general menopausal population

5. Applicability

B

evidence applicable to Australian healthcare context with few caveats

Recommendation

Desvenlafaxine (100–150 mg/d) can be considered for the management of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms in women with a history of breast cancer, based on evidence from a general population of menopausal women.

Note: Desvenlafaxine may alter the serum concentration of tamoxifen and metabolites. There is little evidence for clinical concern resulting from their concomitant use.

GRADE OF RECOMMENDATION

B

 

Practice point D: Antidepressants and sexual symptoms

Evidence summaries

Study characteristics

Study name Population Intervention Level of study Risk of Bias Country

Boekhout 2011

Breast cancer

venlafaxine

75mg/d (slow release)

II

low

the Netherlands

Bordeleau 2010

Breast cancer

venlafaxine

37.5-75mg/d

II

moderate

Canada

Buijs 2009

Breast cancer

venlafaxine

75mg/d

II

moderate

the Netherlands

Loprinzi 2002

Breast cancer

fluoxetine 20 mg/d

II

low

USA

Nunez 2013

Breast cancer

bupropion 300 mg/d

II

moderate

Brazil

Stearns 2005

Breast cancer

paroxetine

10-20 mg/d

II

low

USA

Shams 2014

Menopause

escitalopram

10-20 mg/d

I

low

USA

Practice Point D:

The doses of antidepressants used for the management of vasomotor symptoms are not generally associated with increases in adverse sexual symptoms.

 

Recommendation 22: Clonidine for vasomotor symptoms

Evidence summaries

Study characteristics

Study name Population Intervention Level of study Risk of Bias Country

Boekhout 2011

Breast cancer

clonidine

0.1mg/d

II

low

the Netherlands

Buijs 2009

Breast cancer

clonidine

0.1mg/d

II

moderate

the Netherlands

Loibl 2007

Breast cancer

clonidine

0.15mg/d

II

moderate

Germany

Recommendation matrix

Component Rating Description

1. Evidence base

B

one level II study with a low risk of bias, two level II studies with a moderate risk of bias

2. Consistency

B

most studies consistent and inconsistency may be explained

3. Clinical impact

B

substantial

4. Generalisability

A

population/s studied in body of evidence are the same as the target population for the guideline: all studies were in women treated for breast cancer

5. Applicability

A

directly applicable to Australian healthcare context

Recommendation

Clonidine (0.10 - 0.15 mg/day) can be considered for the management of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms in women with a history of breast cancer.

GRADE OF RECOMMENDATION

B

 

Recommendation 23: Gabapentin for vasomotor symptoms

Evidence summaries

Study characteristics

Study name Population Intervention Level of study Risk of Bias Country

Pandya 2005

Breast cancer

gabapentin

900 mg/d

II

moderate

USA

Bordeleau 2010

Breast cancer

gabapentin

300-900 mg/d

II

moderate

Canada

Ahimahalle 2012

Breast cancer

gabapentin

300 mg/d

II

high

Iran

Biglia 2009

Breast cancer

gabapentin

900 mg/d

II

moderate

Italy

Mao 2015

Breast cancer

gabapentin

300-900 mg/d

II

moderate

USA

Recommendation matrix

Component Rating Description

1. Evidence base

C

Four level II studies with a moderate risk of bias, one level II study with a high risk of bias

2. Consistency

C

some inconsistency reflecting genuine uncertainty around clinical question

3. Clinical impact

B

Substantial

4. Generalisability

A

population/s studied in body of evidence are the same as the target population for the guideline: all studies were in women treated for breast cancer

5. Applicability

B

Evidence applicable to Australian healthcare context with few caveats

Other factors  (Indicate here any other factors that you took into account when assessing the evidence base (for example,  issues that might cause the group to downgrade or upgrade  the recommendation)

Recommendation

Gabapentin (300 - 900 mg/day) can be considered for the management of moderate to severe vasomotor symptoms in women with a history of breast cancer.

GRADE OF RECOMMENDATION

C

 

Recommendation 24: Bupropion for menopausal symptoms

Evidence summaries

Study characteristics

Study name Population Intervention Level of study Risk of Bias Country

Nunez 2013

Breast cancer

bupropion 300 mg/d

II

moderate

Brazil

Recommendation matrix

Component Rating Description

1. Evidence base

C

one level II study with a moderate risk of bias

2. Consistency

N/A

one study only

3. Clinical impact

D

slight or restricted

4. Generalisability

A

population/s studied in body of evidence are the same as the target population for the guideline: all studies were in women treated for breast cancer

5. Applicability

B

applicable to Australian healthcare context with few caveats

Recommendation

Bupropion is not recommended for the management of menopausal symptoms in women with a history of breast cancer due to evidence that it is not effective.

GRADE OF RECOMMENDATION

C

 

Recommendation 25: Desvenlafaxine for sleep disturbance

Evidence summaries

Study characteristics

Study name Population Intervention Level of study Risk of Bias Country

Sun 2013

Menopause

desvenlafaxine

100-150mg/d

I

low

USA

Recommendation matrix

Component Rating Description

1. Evidence base

A

one level I study with a low risk of bias

2. Consistency

A

all studies consistent

3. Clinical impact

B

substantial

4. Generalisability

C

population/s studied in body of evidence different to target population for guideline, but it is clinically sensible to apply this evidence to target population: all studies were in a general menopausal population

5. Applicability

A

directly applicable to Australian healthcare context: all studies were conducted in Australia or developed countries with similar levels of health service delivery

Recommendation

Desvenlafaxine (100 - 150 mg/d) can be considered for the management of sleep disturbance in women with a history of breast cancer, based on evidence from a general population of menopausal women.

Note: Desvenlafaxine may alter the serum concentration of tamoxifen and metabolites. There is little evidence for clinical concern resulting from their concomitant use.

GRADE OF RECOMMENDATION

B

 

Recommendation 26: Paroxetine for sleep disturbance

Evidence summaries

Study characteristics

Study name Population Intervention Level of study Risk of Bias Country

Stearns 2005

Breast cancer

paroxetine

10-20 mg/d

II

low

USA

Recommendation matrix

Component Rating Description

1. Evidence base

B (paroxetine)

one level II study with a low risk of bias

2. Consistency

N/A

One study only

3. Clinical impact

C

moderate

4. Generalisability

A

population/s studied in body of evidence are the same as the target population for the guideline: all studies were in women treated for breast cancer

5. Applicability

A

directly applicable to Australian healthcare context: all studies were conducted in Australia or developed countries with similar levels of health service delivery

Recommendation

Paroxetine (10 - 20 mg/day) can be considered for the management of sleep disturbance in women with a history of breast cancer who are not receiving tamoxifen.

This recommendation is not generalisable to other SSRIs as there is insufficient evidence that they have comparable effects on sleep disturbance.

Note: Paroxetine interacts with tamoxifen and reduces the serum concentration of tamoxifen and metabolites.

GRADE OF RECOMMENDATION

C

 

Recommendation 27: Zolpidem augmentation for sleep disturbance in women taking an SSRI or SNRI

Evidence summaries

Study characteristics

Study name Population Intervention Level of study Risk of Bias Country

Joffe 2010

Breast cancer

zolpidem

10 mg/d

II

moderate

USA

Recommendation matrix

Component Rating Description

1. Evidence base

C

one level II study with a moderate risk of bias

2. Consistency

N/A

one study only

3. Clinical impact

C

moderate

4. Generalisability

A

population/s studied in body of evidence are the same as the target population for the guideline: all studies were in women treated for breast cancer

5. Applicability

A

directly applicable to Australian healthcare context: all studies were conducted in Australia or developed countries with similar levels of health service delivery

Recommendation

The addition of zolpidem (10 mg/d) to an SSRI or SNRI can be considered for the management of sleep disturbance for women with a history of breast cancer.

GRADE OF RECOMMENDATION

C

 

Recommendation 28: Gabapentin for sleep disturbance and Practice Point E

Evidence summaries

Study characteristics

Study name Population Intervention Level of study Risk of Bias Country

Biglia 2009

Breast cancer

gabapentin

900 mg/d

II

moderate

Italy

Bordeleau 2010

Breast cancer

gabapentin

900 mg/d

II

moderate

Canada

Pandya 2005

Breast cancer

gabapentin

300–900 mg/d

II

moderate

USA

Recommendation matrix

Component Rating Description

1. Evidence base

C

three level II studies with a moderate risk of bias

2. Consistency

C

Some inconsistency reflecting genuine uncertainty around clinical question

3. Clinical impact

C

Moderate

4. Generalisability

A

population/s studied in body of evidence are the same as the target population for the guideline: all studies were in women treated for breast cancer

5. Applicability

A

directly applicable to Australian healthcare context: all studies were conducted in Australia or developed countries with similar levels of health service delivery

Recommendation

Gabapentin (300– 900mg/d) can be considered for the management of sleep disturbance in women with a history of breast cancer.

Practice point E:

Gabapentin doses of up to 1200 mg/day can be considered for the alleviation of sleep disturbance in women with a history of breast cancer.

GRADE OF RECOMMENDATION

C

 

Recommendation 29: Topical lidocaine for vulvovaginal symptoms

Evidence summaries

Study characteristics

Study name Population Intervention Level of study Risk of Bias Country

Goetsch 2015

Breast cancer

topical lidocaine

II

moderate

USA

Recommendation matrix

Component Rating Description

1. Evidence base

C

one level II study with a moderate risk of bias

2. Consistency

N/A

one study only

3. Clinical impact

C

moderate

4. Generalisability

A

population/s studied in body of evidence are the same as the target population for the guideline: all studies were in women treated for breast cancer

5. Applicability

A

directly applicable to Australian healthcare context: all studies were conducted in Australia or developed countries with similar levels of health service delivery

Recommendation

Topical lidocaine treatments to the vulvovaginal area can be considered for women with a history of breast cancer experiencing dyspareunia.

Note: The treatment used in the included study was a 4% lidocaine solution applied to the vulvar vestibule for three minutes, followed by application of a silicone lubricant.

GRADE OF RECOMMENDATION

C

 

Recommendation 30: Ospemifene for vulvovaginal symptoms

Evidence summaries

Study characteristics

Study name Population Intervention Level of study Risk of Bias Country

Cui 2013

Menopause

ospemifene

60 mg/d

I

low

USA

Recommendation matrix

Component Rating Description

1. Evidence base

A

one level I study with a low risk of bias

2. Consistency

B

most studies consistent and inconsistency may be explained

3. Clinical impact

C

moderate

4. Generalisability

D

Population/s studied in body of evidence differ to target population and hard to judge whether it is sensible to generalise to target population

5. Applicability

A

directly applicable to Australian healthcare context: all studies were conducted in Australia or developed countries with similar levels of health service delivery

Recommendation

Ospemifene is not recommended for the management of vulvovaginal symptoms as the efficacy and long-term safety in women with a history of breast cancer has not been established.

GRADE OF RECOMMENDATION

C

 

Recommendation 31: Menopause Hormone Therapy for menopausal symptoms

Evidence summaries

Study characteristics

Study name Population Intervention Level of study Risk of Bias Country

Frisk 2008/2012 (HABITS)

Breast cancer

MHT

II

high

Sweden

Von Schoultz 2005; Fahlen 2011

Breast cancer

MHT

II

high

Sweden

Marsden 2001

Breast cancer

MHT

II

high

UK

Holmberg 2004

Breast cancer

MHT

II

high

Sweden

Corbelli 2014

Menopause

oestradiol

< 0.05 mg/d

I

low

Italy, USA

Derzko 2016

Menopause

MHT

I

moderate

North America,  Europe

MacLennan 2004

Menopause

MHT

I

low

Europe, Russia, USA

Nastri 2013

Menopause

MHT

I

low

multinational

Joffe 2014

Menopause

oestradiol

0.5mg/d

II

low

USA

Reed 2014

Menopause

oestradiol

0.5mg/d

II

low

USA

Recommendation matrix

Component Rating Description

1. Evidence base

A

 

three level I studies with a low risk of bias, one level I study with a moderate risk of bias, one level II study with a low risk of bias and four level II studies with a high risk of bias.

2. Consistency

B

most studies consistent and inconsistency may be explained

3. Clinical impact

B

substantial

4. Generalisability

B

population/s studied in the body of evidence are similar to the target population for the guideline

5. Applicability

B

applicable to Australian healthcare context with few caveats

Recommendation

Systemic menopause hormone therapy (oestrogen-only or combined oestrogen and progestogen) should generally be avoided in women with a history of breast cancer because it may increase the risk of new or recurrent breast cancer.

Menopause Hormone Therapy may be considered in exceptional cases for women with a history of breast cancer with severe, intractable vasomotor symptoms. In these cases the potential risks and benefits should be discussed with the treatment team, and treatment should only proceed with the informed consent of the woman and at the lowest effective dose for that woman.

GRADE OF RECOMMENDATION

B

 

Recommendation 32: Tibolone for menopausal symptoms

Evidence summaries

Study characteristics

Study name Population Intervention Level of study Risk of Bias Country

Kenemans 2009/Sismondi 2011 (LIBERATE)

Breast cancer

Tibolone

II

Low

Multinational

Formoso 2012

Menopause

Tibolone

I

Low

Multinational

Recommendation matrix

Component Rating Description

1. Evidence base

A

 

one level I study with a low risk of bias and one level II study with a low risk of bias

2. Consistency

B

most studies consistent and inconsistency may be explained

3. Clinical impact

B

substantial

4. Generalisability

B

population/s studied in the body of evidence are similar to the target population for the guideline

5. Applicability

B

applicable to Australian healthcare context with few caveats

Recommendation

Tibolone should be avoided in women with a history of breast cancer because it increases the risk of new and recurrent breast cancer.

Tibolone may be considered in exceptional cases for women with a history of breast cancer with severe, intractable vasomotor symptoms. In these cases the potential risks and benefits should be discussed with the treatment team, and treatment should only proceed with the informed consent of the woman and at the lowest effective dose for that woman.

GRADE OF RECOMMENDATION

B

 

Recommendation 33: Compounded hormones for menopausal symptoms

Evidence summaries

Study characteristics

Study name Population Intervention Level of study Risk of Bias Country

Whelan 2013

Menopause

Compounded progesterone cream

I

moderate

Australia, UK, USA

Recommendation matrix

Component Rating Description

1. Evidence base

B

One level I study with a moderate risk of bias

2. Consistency

D

evidence is inconsistent

3. Clinical impact

C

moderate

4. Generalisability

D

Population/s studied in body of evidence differ to target population and hard to judge whether it is sensible to generalise to target population

5. Applicability

A

directly applicable to Australian healthcare context

Recommendation

Compounded hormones (‘bioidentical’ hormones) are not recommended for the management of menopausal symptoms in women with a history of breast cancer because the evidence of their effect is inconsistent and their safety after breast cancer is not known.

Note: Compounded hormones are systemically absorbed and may contain high levels of sex steroids which may increase the risk of new or recurrent breast cancer.

GRADE OF RECOMMENDATION

C

 

Recommendation 34: Vaginal oestrogen for vulvovaginal symptoms

Evidence summaries

Study characteristics

Study name Population Intervention Level of study Risk of Bias Country

Rahn 2014

Menopause

vaginal oestrogen

I

low

Europe, Israel, UK, USA

Suckling 2006

Menopause

vaginal oestrogen

I

low

Australia, Europe, North America, Thailand

Recommendation matrix

Component Rating Description

1. Evidence base

A

two level I studies with a low risk of bias

2. Consistency

B

most studies consistent and inconsistency may be explained

3. Clinical impact

C

moderate

4. Generalisability

C

population/s studied in body of evidence differ to target population for guideline but it is clinically sensible to apply this evidence to target population: all studies were in a general menopausal population

5. Applicability

B

directly applicable to Australian healthcare context: all studies were conducted in Australia or developed countries with similar levels of health service delivery

Recommendation

Vaginal oestrogens can be considered for the management of persistent vulvovaginal symptoms in women with a history of breast cancer who are non-responsive to non-hormonal vaginal gels or lubricants. A discussion of the potential risks and benefits between the woman and her treating team is recommended.

Note: Vaginal oestrogen may be systemically absorbed. For women taking Aromatase Inhibitors this may results in measurable increases in circulating oestrogens. The clinical significance of systemic absorption is uncertain.

GRADE OF RECOMMENDATION

C

 

Recommendation 35: Testosterone for sexual function

Evidence summaries

Study characteristics

Study name Population Intervention Level of study Risk of Bias Country

Elraiyah 2014

Menopause

testosterone

I

low

multinational

Somboonporn 2005

Menopause

testosterone

I

low

multinational

Recommendation matrix

Component Rating Description

1. Evidence base

B

two level I studies with a low risk of bias; no evidence of safety or efficacy in a breast cancer population

2. Consistency

B

most studies consistent and inconsistency may be explained

3. Clinical impact

C

moderate

4. Generalisability

D

Population/s studied in body of evidence differ to target population and hard to judge whether it is sensible to generalise to target population

5. Applicability

B

applicable to Australian healthcare context with few caveats: most studies were conducted in Australia or developed countries with similar levels of health service delivery

Recommendation

Exogenous testosterone is not recommended as a treatment to improve sexual function as the efficacy and long-term safety in women with a history of breast cancer has not been established.

GRADE OF RECOMMENDATION

C